GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Grafana vs Langfuse
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Grafana is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 47.8 versus 1.4 for Langfuse, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Grafana if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.8 vs 1.4)
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $29)
- You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or CSA STAR coverage
- Permanent free tier
Choose Langfuse if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 46% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need HIPAA-ready region coverage
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Grafana | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 47.8% | 1.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #2 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 58 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Grafana 0pp · Langfuse 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Grafana leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GrafanaLangfuse
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Grafana ranked higher
0Langfuse ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Grafana | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which observability tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #7 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Grafana | Langfuse |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Fully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana Enterprise | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license |
| Integrations | — | 100+ |
| Compliance | FedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STAR | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2014 | — |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | — |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | — |
| Funding | Series E · $1100M raised | Seed · $4M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation |
Plans side by side
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Grafana
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
- Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
- Cost-effective, good value
- Managed hosting
- Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
- Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
- Capped free-tier limits
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Langfuse”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-langfuse, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.