GrafanaFull-stack observability for the agentic era
vs
OmniThe AI analytics platform
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2
Grafana vs Omni
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Omni is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for Grafana.
Choose Grafana if…
- You need FedRAMP or NATSEC100 or PCI DSS or ISO 27001 or CSA STAR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
Choose Omni if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or HIPAA or CCPA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Grafana | Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Business Intelligence | #44 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Grafana 0pp · Omni 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Omni leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
GrafanaOmni
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Grafana ranked higher
0Omni ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Grafana | Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Fully managed Grafana Cloud on Public Cloud, Federal Cloud or Bring Your Own Cloud, plus self-managed Grafana Enterprise | Cloud, hosted on AWS and Microsoft Azure |
| Compliance | FedRAMP, NATSEC100, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, ISO 27001, CSA STAR | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community support (Free plan), 8x5 email support (Pro plan), Premium support (Enterprise plan) | Hands-on support from an expert team that replies in real time, Real-time availability and incident status page |
| Founded | 2014 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series E · $1100M raised | Series C · $217M raised |
| Best for | Teams that want open-standard observability without lock-in, from startups to Fortune 500 enterprises | Data teams, business users and product teams that need AI analytics on governed data |
Plans side by side
Omni
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Grafana
- Permanent free tier
- Open, composable, flexible platform
- Strong open-source, Prometheus and OpenTelemetry support
- Cost-effective, good value
- Managed hosting
- Complex multi-dimensional usage-based billing
- Self-hosting demands significant engineering maintenance
- Capped free-tier limits
Omni
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Grafana vs Omni”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/grafana-vs-omni, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.