Skip to content
SlateIndex
HiredRecruiting
vs
HumanlyAI recruiting platform for high-volume hiring
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Hired vs Humanly

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.6 for Humanly.

Choose Hired if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.6)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

Choose Humanly if…

  • conversational 24/7 AI screening
  • automated scheduling
  • front-end candidate engagement

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Hired Humanly
Visibility score3.3%0.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#25#58
Share of voice0.7%0.4%
Mentions this run32
Positive in AI answers0%—

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Hired 3%

Hired 0pp · Humanly 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Hired leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0.9%
AI Mode
6.3%
0.9%
Perplexity
3.7%
0%
HiredHumanly

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Hired ranked higher
0Humanly ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionHiredHumanly
Support—Vendor team can help design and optimize AI Interviewers on request
Founded—2020
HeadquartersJacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH)Seattle, Washington
Employees5,000+11–50
FundingSeries D · $133M raisedSeries B · $52M raised
Best forEmployers hiring tech and sales talentHigh-volume hiring teams recruiting hourly, frontline and field workers

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Hired

Profile in progress.

Humanly

  • conversational 24/7 AI screening
  • automated scheduling
  • front-end candidate engagement

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Hired vs Humanly”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hired-vs-humanly, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.