hireEZEnterprise Hiring, Run by Agents. Recruiters Decide.
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
hireEZ vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
hireEZ is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.5 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose hireEZ if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.5 vs 0.6)
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | hireEZ | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.5% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #33 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
hireEZ 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
hireEZ leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
hireEZTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0hireEZ ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | hireEZ | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $494 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Layered on top of the customer's existing ATS with no rip-and-replace, deployed in weeks. | — |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | — | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | — | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, US | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise talent acquisition teams that want agentic AI added to their existing ATS, as well as individual recruiters starting out. | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
hireEZ
- AI-powered outbound sourcing
- cross-platform talent mapping
- diversity hiring support
- AI-assisted sourcing capabilities
- per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “hireEZ vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hireez-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.