HireVueFaster, fairer, and effortlessly intelligent.
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
HireVue vs Loxo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 1.5 for HireVue, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose HireVue if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27701 or FedRAMP Moderate or EU-US DPF or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 1.5)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 45+)
- 7-day free trial
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | HireVue | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #46 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HireVue 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HireVueLoxo
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1HireVue ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | HireVue | Loxo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #13 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HireVue | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 7-day trial |
| Integrations | 45+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, FedRAMP Moderate, EU-US DPF, GDPR | — |
| Support | 24/7 customer support in 20+ languages, Professional services team for training and change management | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Sandy, Utah | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Private equity investment led by The Carlyle Group · $93M raised | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised |
| Best for | High-volume employers hiring frontline workers, and hiring teams filling professional roles | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams |
Plans side by side
HireVue
Pricing not available.
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HireVue
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
- Structured digital assessments and workflow automation
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HireVue vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hirevue-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.