HireVueFaster, fairer, and effortlessly intelligent.
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
HireVue vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 1.5 for HireVue, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose HireVue if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27701 or FedRAMP Moderate or EU-US DPF or GDPR coverage
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
- Structured digital assessments and workflow automation
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 1.5)
- You need more native integrations (270+ vs 45+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 25% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | HireVue | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #46 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HireVue 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HireVueWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0HireVue ranked higher
3Workable ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | HireVue | Workable |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #15 | #6 |
| Which recruiting vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #9 | #7 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #13 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HireVue | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | 45+ | 270+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, FedRAMP Moderate, EU-US DPF, GDPR | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | 24/7 customer support in 20+ languages, Professional services team for training and change management | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Sandy, Utah | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Private equity investment led by The Carlyle Group · $93M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | High-volume employers hiring frontline workers, and hiring teams filling professional roles | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
HireVue
Pricing not available.
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HireVue
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
- Structured digital assessments and workflow automation
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HireVue vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hirevue-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.