Greenhouse vs HireVue
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 1.5 for HireVue, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Greenhouse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 1.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 25% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose HireVue if…
- You need SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27701 or FedRAMP Moderate or EU-US DPF coverage
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
- Structured digital assessments and workflow automation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Greenhouse | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #1 | #46 |
| Share of voice | 8.1% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 43 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Greenhouse 0pp · HireVue 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Greenhouse | HireVue |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a recruiting platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #14 | #5 |
| What are the best recruiting tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #1 | #15 |
| Which recruiting vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #4 | #9 |
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #1 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Greenhouse | HireVue |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Integrations | — | 45+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, FedRAMP Moderate, EU-US DPF, GDPR |
| Support | — | 24/7 customer support in 20+ languages, Professional services team for training and change management |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Sandy, Utah |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D · $110M raised | Private equity investment led by The Carlyle Group · $93M raised |
| Best for | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | High-volume employers hiring frontline workers, and hiring teams filling professional roles |
Plans side by side
HireVue
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Greenhouse
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
HireVue
- Recognized as a market leader in high-volume video interviewing
- Structured digital assessments and workflow automation
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs HireVue”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-hirevue, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.