HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
JetOctopusTechnical SEO Platform for Google & AI Search
Comparison · SEO Tools · weekly run Nov 2
HubSpot vs JetOctopus
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in SEO Tools: it has a visibility score of 10.5 versus 0.4 for JetOctopus.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.5 vs 0.4)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose JetOctopus if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 35% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- deep server log analysis
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | HubSpot | JetOctopus |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.5% | 0.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in SEO Tools | #9 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 3.9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot 0pp · JetOctopus 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HubSpotJetOctopus
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0HubSpot ranked higher
0JetOctopus ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | JetOctopus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | $349 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 7-day trial |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud SaaS |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | — |
| Support | Phone | Standard online support, Online support with Slack channel on higher plans, 24/7 dedicated support on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2006 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | Tallinn, Estonia |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 11–50 |
| Funding | Corporate round | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Large websites, enterprise SEO teams and agencies |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
JetOctopus
Growth (In-House Teams)$349month, billed annually ($459/month quarterly)
Pro (In-House Teams)$809month, billed annually ($1089/month quarterly)
Ultra (In-House Teams)$1,559month, billed annually ($2069/month quarterly)
UnlimitedCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
JetOctopus
- deep server log analysis
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs JetOctopus”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-jetoctopus, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.