HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
MailjetDesign, deliver, and automate marketing and transactional emails together
Comparison · Email Marketing · weekly run Nov 2
HubSpot vs Mailjet
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Email Marketing: it has a visibility score of 29.4 versus 3.8 for Mailjet, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.4 vs 3.8)
- You want a lower entry price ($7 vs $9)
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 0% positive)
Choose Mailjet if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or SOC 2 or GDPR or CCPA or PCI DSS or CSA STAR Level 1 or HIPAA or Certified Senders Alliance coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- straightforward annual pricing discount
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | HubSpot | Mailjet |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 29.4% | 3.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Email Marketing | #4 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 6.8% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 36 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot 0pp · Mailjet 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HubSpotMailjet
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
4HubSpot ranked higher
0Mailjet ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | HubSpot | Mailjet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Email Marketing platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular email marketing platform | Perplexity | #7 | #12 |
| Official website of the top email marketing platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #22 |
| Who makes the most used email marketing platform? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | Mailjet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud-hosted in EU data centers |
| Integrations | 2000+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | ISO 27001, ISO 27701, SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA, PCI DSS, CSA STAR Level 1, HIPAA, Certified Senders Alliance |
| Support | Phone | Online support, Priority support (Premium plan), Phone and chat support (from 50k plan), Dedicated Technical Account Manager (Custom plan) |
| Founded | 2006 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | Paris, France |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Corporate round | Series Unknown (investment by Entrepreneur Venture, amount undisclosed) |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Marketing and development teams that want marketing and transactional email on one platform |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Mailjet
Free$0month
Starter$9month (8,000 emails/month)
Essential$19month (15,000 emails/month)
Premium$29month (15,000 emails/month)
CustomCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Mailjet
- straightforward annual pricing discount
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Mailjet”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-mailjet, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.