HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
RingoverAI-Powered Communications to Accelerate Your Growth
Comparison · Contact Center · weekly run Nov 3
HubSpot vs Ringover
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Contact Center: it has a visibility score of 14.1 versus 2.7 for Ringover.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.1 vs 2.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 100+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
Choose Ringover if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (86% vs 35% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS for service providers or HDS (health data hosting) or ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 50001 coverage
- Highest average rating on Capterra, tied at 4.83/5
- Large, well-validated review base (429 reviews)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | HubSpot | Ringover |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 14.1% | 2.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | down−0.7% |
| Rank in Contact Center | #12 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 3.3% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 19 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 86% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot −1.5pp · Ringover −0.6999999999999997pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HubSpotRingover
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0HubSpot ranked higher
0Ringover ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | Ringover |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 2000+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | PCI-DSS for service providers, HDS (health data hosting), ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 50001 |
| Support | Phone | Dedicated 24/7 support on Enterprise plan, Dedicated Customer Success Manager, Tailored onboarding and training, Priority support on Business AI plan |
| Founded | 2006 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | London, Barcelona and Atlanta |
| Employees | 5,000+ | — |
| Funding | Corporate round | Funding round (€20M) · $32M raised |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Sales, recruitment and staffing, and customer support teams that rely on phone calls every day |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Ringover
Talk$19user/month (12-month commitment, min 3 users); $29 monthly
Business$49user/month (12-month commitment, min 3 users); $69 monthly
Unified$69user/month (12-month commitment, min 3 users); $89 monthly
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, minimum 50 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Ringover
- Highest average rating on Capterra, tied at 4.83/5
- Large, well-validated review base (429 reviews)
- Among the strongest contact center platforms by current user reviews
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Ringover”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-ringover, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.