HumanlyAI recruiting platform for high-volume hiring
vs
RecruiterflowAI-native ATS and CRM for executive search, recruiting and staffing agencies
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Humanly vs Recruiterflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Recruiterflow is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.1 versus 0.6 for Humanly.
Choose Humanly if…
- conversational 24/7 AI screening
- automated scheduling
- front-end candidate engagement
Choose Recruiterflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.1 vs 0.6)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Humanly | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 3.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #58 | #30 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Humanly 0pp · Recruiterflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Recruiterflow leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HumanlyRecruiterflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Humanly ranked higher
0Recruiterflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Humanly | Recruiterflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $149 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 30+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 1, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | Vendor team can help design and optimize AI Interviewers on request | SLA-backed support, Dedicated implementation, Live chat with a rep, FAQ and help articles |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B · $52M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | High-volume hiring teams recruiting hourly, frontline and field workers | Retained, contingent and executive search firms and recruiting and staffing agencies that want AI tools alongside a full ATS and CRM |
Plans side by side
Humanly
Pricing not available.
Recruiterflow
Platform Plan$149per user / month
AIRA PlanCustomcustom pricing (contact sales)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Humanly
- conversational 24/7 AI screening
- automated scheduling
- front-end candidate engagement
Recruiterflow
- Attractive for recruitment agencies and staffing teams
- Priced at $119/user/month billed annually
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Humanly vs Recruiterflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/humanly-vs-recruiterflow, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.