Icertis vs Quotient
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0 for Quotient.
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
Choose Quotient if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Icertis | Quotient |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #23 | #52 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Icertis 0pp · Quotient 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Icertis | Quotient |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $28 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 21-day trial |
| Deployment | Public or private cloud | Cloud |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA | — |
| Support | — | Help articles for each integration |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Hamilton, New Zealand |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts | Businesses that send quotes to customers and want them accepted online |
Plans side by side
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Quotient
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Quotient”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-quotient, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.