Skip to content
SlateIndex
JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
vs
LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

JazzHR vs Loxo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

JazzHR is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose JazzHR if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 1.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (36% vs 17% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

Choose Loxo if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $1,000)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • 7-day free trial

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric JazzHR Loxo
Visibility score14.4%1.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#9#40
Share of voice4.3%0.9%
Mentions this run225
Positive in AI answers36%17%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3JazzHR 14%

JazzHR 0pp · Loxo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

JazzHR leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.1%
1.3%
AI Mode
18%
1.3%
Perplexity
14.1%
3.1%
JazzHRLoxo

Head to head in AI answers

3 engine answers name both brands

3JazzHR ranked higher
0Loxo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJazzHRLoxo
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry price$1,000 / mo$149 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 7-day trial
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001—
SupportContact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro planDedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that
Founded—2012
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado, USAustin, Texas
Employees51–20051–200
FundingRound led by Volition CapitalGrowth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised
Best forSmall and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking systemScaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams

Plans side by side

JazzHR

Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
JazzHR pricing

Loxo

Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Loxo pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

JazzHR

  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
  • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
  • Annual plans save up to 24%

    Loxo

    • 7-day free trial
    • High per-user pricing
    • Annual-only plans paid upfront

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “JazzHR vs Loxo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jazzhr-vs-loxo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.