JazzHR alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside JazzHR
WorkableBest forCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.86% of JazzHR answersZohoBest forBusinesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR64% of JazzHR answersManatalBest forHR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters59% of JazzHR answersGreenhouseBest forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises55% of JazzHR answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
JazzHR has a visibility score of 14.4 in Recruiting, #9 of 83. AI answers that name JazzHR most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workable | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. | $299 / mo | 30.1% | An AI agent built into a full applicant tracking system, which reads the system of record before it acts and inherits the platform's security and access model. |
| Zoho | Businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR | — | 44.8% | A broad suite of 60+ in-house products on a technology stack and data centers Zoho owns, with no ad-based revenue |
| Manatal | HR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters | $15 per seat / mo | 15% | Claims to be the first ATS to offer an MCP server that connects to LLMs such as ChatGPT. |
| Greenhouse | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Contact sales | 38.5% | Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal |
Alternative 1
Workable vs JazzHR →Workable
Workable suits companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses..
Quick facts
- $299 / mo · flat tiers
- 15-day free trial
- 30.1% visibility score · #2 in Recruiting
- 270+ native integrations
Key features
- Workable ATS — Applicant tracking system covering requisitions, sourcing, pipelines, interviews, offers and analytics.
- Workable Agent — AI recruiting agents that source, screen and engage candidates inside the ATS, sold as four agents including Sourcing, Screening and Engagement.
- Workable HR — HR information system with employee onboarding, time off, time tracking, e-signatures and payroll preparation.
- Performance & Engagement — 360-degree performance reviews, performance tracking and employee surveys, sold as an add-on.
Workable vs JazzHR
| Dimension | Workable | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 30.1% | 14.4% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $1,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 15-day free trial | — |
Pros
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
Cons
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Alternative 2
Zoho vs JazzHR →Zoho
Zoho suits businesses of all sizes, from startups to enterprises, wanting one suite for sales, support, finance and HR.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 44.8% visibility score · #3 in CRM
Key features
- Zoho CRM — Manage sales, marketing and support in one CRM platform.
- Zoho Desk — Customer service software for support teams.
- Zoho Creator — Low-code platform to build custom business apps.
- Zoho One — Unified suite of 50+ business applications.
Zoho vs JazzHR
| Dimension | Zoho | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 44.8% | 14.4% |
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $1,000 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong value for money and low cost
- Free tier for small teams
- Broad functionality and integrated app ecosystem
- Good customization options
- Scales well as businesses grow
Cons
- Less premium user experience
- Pricing varies dramatically across products
Alternative 3
Manatal vs JazzHR →Manatal
Manatal suits hR teams, recruitment agencies, and headhunters.
Quick facts
- $15 per seat / mo · per seat
- 14-day free trial
- 15% visibility score · #8 in Recruiting
- 2500+ native integrations
Key features
- Manatal ATS — Applicant tracking system with customizable pipelines, a Kanban board, and candidate profiles.
- Recruitment CRM — CRM for agencies and headhunters to track clients, placements, and revenue.
- Manatal AI — AI Interviewer for automated screening, AI Copilot for candidate summaries, and AI candidate recommendations and scoring.
- Candidate Sourcing — Job posting to job boards and a Chrome sourcing extension, with candidate profile enrichment from social and public platforms.
Manatal vs JazzHR
| Dimension | Manatal | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 15% | 14.4% |
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $15 per seat / mo | $1,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | 14-day free trial | — |
Pros
- Advanced AI-driven candidate enrichment and match scoring
- Affordable pricing with annual savings
- Free trial with no credit card required
- Cheapest per-recruiter pricing among compared tools
- Recommended for lower-cost recruiting software
Cons
- Entry plan limits the number of open jobs
Alternative 4
Greenhouse vs JazzHR →Greenhouse
Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting
Key features
- Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
- Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
- Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
- Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.
Greenhouse vs JazzHR
| Dimension | Greenhouse | JazzHR |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 14.4% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $1,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| JazzHR | Flat tiers | $1,000 / mo |
| Workable | Flat tiers | $299 / mo |
| Zoho | — | — |
| Manatal | Per seat | $15 per seat / mo |
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside JazzHR in the latest weekly run.