Skip to content
SlateIndex
JazzHREasy-to-use recruiting software for small business
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

JazzHR vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 14.4 for JazzHR, and ranks ahead in 74% of the answers that name both.

Choose JazzHR if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 14.4)
  • You want a lower entry price ($299 vs $1,000)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 36% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric JazzHR Workable
Visibility score14.4%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#9#2
Share of voice4.3%7.2%
Mentions this run2238
Positive in AI answers36%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3JazzHR 14%

JazzHR 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.1%
34.1%
AI Mode
18%
29.4%
Perplexity
14.1%
26.7%
JazzHRWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

19 engine answers name both brands

5JazzHR ranked higher
14Workable ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJazzHRWorkable
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry price$1,000 / mo$299 / mo
Free planNoNo · 15-day trial
Deployment—Cloud-based SaaS
Integrations—270+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportContact the support team through the website, All-Access Support on the Pro planPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded—2012
HeadquartersDenver, Colorado, USBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingRound led by Volition CapitalSeries C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forSmall and mid-sized businesses and lean teams that need an easy-to-use applicant tracking systemCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

JazzHR

Hero$1,000per year, billed annually
Plus$3,480per year, billed annually
Pro$5,508per year, billed annually
JazzHR pricing

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

JazzHR

  • Approachable, collaborative ATS for small growing teams
  • Budget-friendly option for small teams
  • Unlimited users and flat entry pricing
  • Low administrative drag for early-stage teams
  • Annual plans save up to 24%

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “JazzHR vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jazzhr-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.