Skip to content
SlateIndex
JobDivaRecruitment software for staffing agencies
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

JobDiva vs Workable

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 2.4 for JobDiva, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose JobDiva if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 44% positive)
  • Highly rated (4.7/5 on G2)
  • Suited to high-volume staffing firms
  • Robust applicant tracking and candidate relationship management

Choose Workable if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 2.4)
  • You need more native integrations (270+ vs 100+)
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric JobDiva Workable
Visibility score2.4%30.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#34#2
Share of voice0.8%7.2%
Mentions this run438
Positive in AI answers50%44%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3JobDiva 2%

JobDiva 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
34.1%
AI Mode
3.1%
29.4%
Perplexity
3.1%
26.7%
JobDivaWorkable

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0JobDiva ranked higher
1Workable ranked higher
PromptEngineJobDivaWorkable
Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors ChatGPT#17#9

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionJobDivaWorkable
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$299 / mo
Free plan—No · 15-day trial
DeploymentCloud-based SaaSCloud-based SaaS
Integrations100+270+
Compliance—ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3
SupportPhone: 866-JOB-DIVA, Support contact form, Submit RFP, FAQPriority support on Premier and Enterprise plans
Founded—2012
HeadquartersNew York, NYBoston, Massachusetts, USA
Employees51–200201–500
FundingAccelerator/incubator deal (AI Venture Labs)Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised
Best forStaffing agencies and recruiting firmsCompanies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses.

Plans side by side

JobDiva

Pricing not available.

Workable

Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Workable pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

JobDiva

  • Highly rated (4.7/5 on G2)
  • Suited to high-volume staffing firms
  • Robust applicant tracking and candidate relationship management
  • Powerful search capabilities

    Workable

    • fast deployment and ease of use
    • intuitive automation and candidate tracking
    • transparent pricing and free trial
    • all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
    • candidate sourcing
    • costs more than lightweight ATS options

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “JobDiva vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jobdiva-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.