Keeper Security vs Transmit Security
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Transmit Security is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keeper Security if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Transmit Security if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keeper Security | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.1% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #36 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Transmit Security leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keeper Security | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #13 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keeper Security | Transmit Security |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $50,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTe | — |
| Support | Phone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper University | Enterprise SLA with premium support |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Minority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raised | Series A · $543M raised |
| Best for | Organizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platform | Large enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention |
Plans side by side
Keeper Security
Transmit Security
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keeper Security
Profile in progress.
Transmit Security
- Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
- Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
- Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
- Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.