Skip to content
SlateIndex
Keeper SecurityThe identity security platform for humans, machines and AI agents
vs
ZITADELIdentity infrastructure, simplified for you.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Keeper Security vs ZITADEL

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

Track both brands

The short answer

ZITADEL is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 1.3 versus 0.5 for Keeper Security.

Choose Keeper Security if…

  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP High or GovRAMP High or FIPS 140-3 or PCI DSS Level 1 or HIPAA or GDPR or FDA 21 CFR Part 11 or TRUSTe coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

Choose ZITADEL if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.3 vs 0.5)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (83% vs 0% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Keeper Security ZITADEL
Visibility score0.5%1.3%
Change vs last weekdown−0.1%up+0.5%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#36#27
Share of voice0.3%0.4%
Mentions this run11
Positive in AI answers0%83%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Keeper Security 1%

Keeper Security −0.19999999999999996pp · ZITADEL −1.8pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

ZITADEL leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.2%
3.9%
AI Mode
0%
2.6%
Perplexity
0.9%
0%
Keeper SecurityZITADEL

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Keeper Security ranked higher
0ZITADEL ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionKeeper SecurityZITADEL
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $100 / mo
Free planNoYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)Cloud and self-hosted
Integrations100+—
ComplianceISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3, FedRAMP High, GovRAMP High, FIPS 140-3, PCI DSS Level 1, HIPAA, GDPR, FDA 21 CFR Part 11, TRUSTeISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II
SupportPhone support, Live chat, Documentation, Keeper UniversityDiscord community, GitHub, Documentation, Technical Account Manager (Enterprise)
Founded20112020
HeadquartersChicago, Illinois, United StatesSan Francisco, CA, United States
Employees501–1,00011–50
FundingMinority growth equity (Summit Partners) · $60M raisedSeries A · $16M raised
Best forOrganizations wanting password, secrets and privileged access management in one zero-knowledge cloud platformDevelopers building applications that need authentication for consumers, businesses or employees, including multi-tenant B2B apps.

Plans side by side

Keeper Security

Business Starter Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Business Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
Enterprise Password ManagerCustomuser / month billed annually
KeeperMSPCustomcontact sales
KeeperPAMCustomrequest a quote
Keeper Security pricing

ZITADEL

Free$0month
Pro$100month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
ZITADEL pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Keeper Security

Profile in progress.

ZITADEL

  • Free cloud tier with core features like MFA and OIDC
  • Cloud-native, open-source IAM with strong multi-tenancy and audit logging
  • Clear usage limits and published monthly pricing
  • Good for developer-focused IAM
  • Cloud-based IAM without managing infrastructure

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keeper Security vs ZITADEL”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keeper-security-vs-zitadel, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.