Keycloak vs OneLogin
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OneLogin is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Keycloak if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 19% positive)
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
Choose OneLogin if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 5.6)
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Keycloak | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 10.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.3% | up+0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #15 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 2.1% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 19% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp · OneLogin +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OneLogin leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Keycloak | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #8 | #6 |
| Most affordable identity and access management platform that is still reliable | Perplexity | #5 | #2 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #2 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keycloak | OneLogin |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability | — |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | Aliso Viejo, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Secondary market |
| Best for | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications | Organizations securing workforce, customer and partner access with SSO and MFA |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
OneLogin
- Low-cost option for small and mid-sized organizations
- 30-day free trial and structured evaluation program
- SSO, MFA, provisioning and directory features in one IAM platform
- Robust app catalog and developer-friendly provisioning
- Vendor-agnostic, cost-effective alternative to Okta
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keycloak vs OneLogin”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keycloak-vs-onelogin, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.