LangfuseOpen Source Agent Evals & Observability
vs
UptraceCut your observability bill by 90%
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Langfuse vs Uptrace
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Langfuse is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0.7 for Uptrace.
Choose Langfuse if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or HIPAA-ready region or GDPR coverage
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Choose Uptrace if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Langfuse | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #27 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 50% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Langfuse 0pp · Uptrace 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Langfuse leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LangfuseUptrace
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Langfuse ranked higher
0Uptrace ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Langfuse | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Langfuse Cloud in US, EU, Japan and HIPAA regions, or self-hosted under the MIT license | Uptrace Cloud, or self-hosted with Docker, Ansible or Kubernetes, or on-premises with a license |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA-ready region, GDPR | — |
| Support | Community support via GitHub, In-app support, Private Slack or MS Teams channel on Pro and Enterprise plans, Named lead support engineer on Enterprise plans | 16/5 enterprise support across EU and US business hours, Email and scheduled calls, Dedicated support engineer on on-premises plans |
| Headquarters | — | Chisinau, Moldova |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Seed · $4M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Engineering teams building LLM applications and AI agents that want open-source, self-hostable tracing and evaluation | Engineering teams that run OpenTelemetry and want traces, metrics and logs in one platform at predictable cost. |
Plans side by side
Uptrace
Uptrace CloudCustomper GB ingested, usage-based; no seats or hosts
Community Edition$0free forever, self-hosted
On-premisesCustomlicense, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Langfuse
- Discounted cloud pricing for qualifying early-stage startups
- Well suited to evaluating and debugging LLM or agent behavior
Uptrace
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Langfuse vs Uptrace”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langfuse-vs-uptrace, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.