LangGraphLow-level orchestration framework and runtime for long-running, stateful agents.
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
LangGraph vs Zapier
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangGraph is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 24.4 versus 13.5 for Zapier, and ranks ahead in 71% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangGraph if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (24.4 vs 13.5)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 29% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or HIPAA coverage
Choose Zapier if…
- You need SOC 3 or CCPA coverage
- Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
- Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
- Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangGraph | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 24.4% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #4 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 5.3% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 33 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 44% | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangGraph 0pp · Zapier 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangGraph leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LangGraphZapier
Head to head in AI answers
7 engine answers name both brands
5LangGraph ranked higher
2Zapier ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | LangGraph | Zapier |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #2 | #5 |
| What are the best AI Agents tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #3 | #8 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | ChatGPT | #6 | #3 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI agent platform | Perplexity | #3 | #10 |
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #4 | #8 |
| Best AI agent platform with AI features | Perplexity | #8 | #6 |
| Who makes the most used AI agent platform? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangGraph | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $19.99 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS in US and EU regions, plus self-hosted and hybrid options available on Enterprise only. | Multi-tenant cloud |
| Integrations | — | 9000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | — | Email support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on |
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B | Equity crowdfunding |
| Best for | Teams building long-running, stateful AI agents. | Businesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps. |
Plans side by side
LangGraph
Pricing not available.
Zapier
Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangGraph
- Production standard for stateful, multi-agent workflows
- Strong engineering control for complex, cyclical agent logic
- Widely adopted open-source developer framework
- Best choice for autonomous AI agents
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding effort
Zapier
- Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
- Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
- Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
- Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
- Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
- Free plans have limited monthly activities
- Not a standalone marketing automation platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangGraph vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langgraph-vs-zapier, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.