LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
PlaniswareAI-powered strategic portfolio management
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Planisware
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 2.8 for Planisware.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 2.8)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
Choose Planisware if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (75% vs 54% positive)
- You need ISO-certified standards coverage
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 75% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Planisware 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearPlanisware
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Planisware ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Planisware |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Cloud-based SaaS on a fully owned, single-tenant cloud infrastructure |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | ISO-certified standards |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | — |
| Founded | 2019 | 1996 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Châtillon, France |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | IPO on Euronext Paris (about €278 million including over-allotment) |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | PMOs that need a turnkey PPM solution with immediate results and room to grow |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Planisware
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Planisware
- recommended by analysts for large-enterprise project and portfolio management
- suited to formal portfolio governance and resource optimization
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Planisware”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-planisware, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.