LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
Resource GuruSmarter scheduling. Profitable projects. Happy teams.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Resource Guru
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Linear is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 7.9 versus 0 for Resource Guru.
Choose Linear if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.9 vs 0)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
Choose Resource Guru if…
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $10)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Resource Guru |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #62 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Resource Guru 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Linear leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearResource Guru
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Resource Guru ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Resource Guru |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | $5 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Web-based, with no software installation needed |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Help Center, Email support, Phone support on the Master plan, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Remote, United Kingdom |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Seed · $1M raised |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | Agencies, consultants, construction, engineering and IT teams that need to schedule people and projects against real capacity |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Resource Guru
Grasshopper$5per person, per month
Blackbelt$8per person, per month
Master$12per person, per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom contract
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Resource Guru
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Resource Guru”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-resource-guru, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.