LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
TeamworkMost tools track work. We make it profitable.
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Linear vs Teamwork
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Teamwork is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 9.6 versus 7.9 for Linear.
Choose Linear if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 12% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
Choose Teamwork if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.6 vs 7.9)
- You want a lower entry price ($9.99 vs $10)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Linear | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.9% | 9.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #12 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 2% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 54% | 12% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Linear 0pp · Teamwork 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Teamwork leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LinearTeamwork
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Linear ranked higher
0Teamwork ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Linear | Teamwork |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $9.99 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United States | Cloud-hosted SaaS on Amazon Web Services, with US or EU data hosting. |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Priority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan) | Premium support, Dedicated customer success manager (Enterprise), Free expert training, Onboarding services |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Cork, Ireland |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series C · $134M raised | Growth investment from Bregal Milestone |
| Best for | Product and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared system | Agencies, consultancies, IT services and implementation teams that bill clients for project work. |
Plans side by side
Linear
Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Teamwork
Free$0per user/month billed yearly
Basics$9.99per user/month billed yearly
Accelerate$24.99per user/month billed yearly
OptimizeCustomper user/month billed yearly, contact sales
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Linear
- Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
- Generous free plan
- Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
- Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams
Teamwork
- Client-project, time-tracking, and profitability capabilities suit agencies needing billing
- Rated Editors' Choice by PCMag at 4.5/5 and recommended for client services
- Included in strong general project management shortlist
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Teamwork”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-teamwork, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.