Skip to content
SlateIndex
LinearThe product development system for teams and agents
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3

Linear vs Wrike

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 7.9 for Linear, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Linear if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (54% vs 39% positive)
  • You need GDPR or HIPAA (BAA available) or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 coverage
  • Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
  • Generous free plan

Choose Wrike if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 7.9)
  • You need ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
  • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
  • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Linear Wrike
Visibility score7.9%13.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Project Management#12#8
Share of voice2%4.4%
Mentions this run1126
Positive in AI answers54%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Linear 8%

Linear 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Wrike leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
7.8%
18.9%
AI Mode
8.2%
2.2%
Perplexity
7.8%
19.3%
LinearWrike

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

2Linear ranked higher
2Wrike ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLinearWrike
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $10 per seat / moFree; paid from $10 per seat / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud-hosted SaaS; workspace data can be stored in the European Union or the United StatesCloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts
Integrations—400+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (BAA available), ISO/IEC 27001:2022SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant
SupportPriority support (Enterprise plan), Account manager (Enterprise plan)Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support
Founded20192006
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Diego, California, US
Employees—1,001–5,000
FundingSeries C · $134M raisedSeries B
Best forProduct and engineering teams that build software and want humans and AI agents working in one shared systemEnterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale

Plans side by side

Linear

Free$0free for everyone
Basic$10per user/month, billed yearly
Business$16per user/month, billed yearly
EnterpriseCustomannual billing only
Linear pricing

Wrike

Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Wrike pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Linear

  • Fast issue tracking for software engineering teams
  • Generous free plan
  • Transparent, scalable pricing tiers
  • Good fit for SaaS and tech product teams

    Wrike

    • Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
    • Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
    • Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
    • Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
    • Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Linear vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linear-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.