LinkSquares vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 1.4 for LinkSquares, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LinkSquares if…
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
- Useful post-signature insights
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 1.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 33% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | LinkSquares | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #31 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LinkSquares 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LinkSquares | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #11 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LinkSquares | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Multi-tenant or single-tenant cloud SaaS hosted on U.S.-based AWS infrastructure | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Boston, MA, United States | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Announced funding round (undated) · $160M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Legal, procurement, finance and sales teams that need every agreement in one governed system | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
LinkSquares
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LinkSquares
- Powerful AI-driven contract analytics
- Useful post-signature insights
- Suited to fast-growing companies and in-house counsel
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LinkSquares vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/linksquares-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.