LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
MouseflowAI Powered Behavior Analytics. Remove Friction. Drive Growth.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Looker vs Mouseflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0.3 for Mouseflow.
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
Choose Mouseflow if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or LGPD or SOC 2 Type II or PCI DSS or HIPAA (US data center) or EU-US DPF coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Looker | Mouseflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #30 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · Mouseflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LookerMouseflow
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Looker ranked higher
0Mouseflow ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | Mouseflow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Google Cloud | A small JavaScript snippet added before the closing body tag of a website |
| Integrations | — | 42+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, HIPAA (US data center), EU-US DPF |
| Support | — | In-app chat, Live chat and email support, Personalized onboarding and training for enterprise customers, Dedicated customer success manager on higher plans |
| Founded | — | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | Seed |
| Best for | — | Marketing, CRO, eCommerce, UX and analytics teams that need to see why website visitors drop off |
Plans side by side
Looker
Pricing not available.
Mouseflow
Free$0month
Essential$25month
Advanced$109month
Premium$319month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Mouseflow
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs Mouseflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-mouseflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.