LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
PegaThe leading AI-powered platform for enterprise transformation
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Looker vs Pega
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Looker is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 0.6 for Pega, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Looker if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 20% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
Choose Pega if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or PCI DSS or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or HITRUST or GDPR or IRAP coverage
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Looker | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #13 | #68 |
| Share of voice | 2.5% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 17 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · Pega 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Looker leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LookerPega
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Looker ranked higher
0Pega ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Looker | Pega |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI Agents vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #13 | #24 |
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | ChatGPT | #4 | #27 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Google Cloud | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 200+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP |
| Founded | — | 1983 |
| Headquarters | — | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | — | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | IPO |
| Best for | — | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs Pega”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-pega, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.