LookerAgentic business intelligence and embedded analytics on Google Cloud
vs
Simple AnalyticsA focused web analytics tool for teams that need the full picture without tracking people.
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Looker vs Simple Analytics
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Simple Analytics is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.3 versus 1.4 for Looker.
Choose Looker if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (30% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or FedRAMP or HIPAA coverage
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
Choose Simple Analytics if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.3 vs 1.4)
- You need GDPR compliant (vendor states) coverage
- simple pricing
- annual plan savings and free months
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Looker | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 4.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #30 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 30% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Looker 0pp · Simple Analytics 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Simple Analytics leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LookerSimple Analytics
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Looker ranked higher
0Simple Analytics ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Looker | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Google Cloud | SaaS, with data stored and processed in the Netherlands (EU) |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, HIPAA | GDPR compliant (vendor states) |
| Support | — | Contact form, Demo booking, Assisted 30-day proof of concept alongside GA4 |
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| Headquarters | — | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series E · $280M raised | Other Investors (Web3 Foundation grant program), undated |
| Best for | — | Teams that need pageviews without consent banners or personal data, and analysts who want an independent traffic count next to GA4. |
Plans side by side
Looker
Pricing not available.
Simple Analytics
Free$0month
Self-serve$20month (100k pageviews; scales with usage)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Looker
- Governed semantic layer and metric consistency
- Strong integration with Google Cloud, BigQuery and Workspace
- Developer-centric data modeling via LookML
- Around 4.5 out of 5 stars on Gartner Peer Insights
- Quote-only enterprise pricing starting above $60,000 a year
- Poor fit for NoSQL-heavy data stacks or standalone embedded needs
- Less suited to teams using macOS without virtual machines
Simple Analytics
- simple pricing
- annual plan savings and free months
- privacy-friendly analytics
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Looker vs Simple Analytics”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/looker-vs-simple-analytics, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.