LoomWe're bringing video messaging to work and empowering everyone to communicate more effectively, wherever they are.
vs
PapermarkSecure data rooms for modern dealmakers
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Loom vs Papermark
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loom is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.1 versus 0 for Papermark.
Choose Loom if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.1 vs 0)
- You need GDPR or CCPA or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Choose Papermark if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Loom | Papermark |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.1% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #32 | #49 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loom 0pp · Papermark 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loom leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoomPapermark
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loom ranked higher
0Papermark ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loom | Papermark |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, built on AWS infrastructure | Hosted SaaS (Papermark Cloud) or self-hosted on own infrastructure; self-hosting for production or commercial use requires an enterprise license |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Priority support on Business and Business + AI plans, Dedicated support and a dedicated account manager on Enterprise | Email support, Documentation, Enterprise support with self-hosting |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series C · $204M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Sales, engineering, customer support and design teams that want to share context by video message instead of meetings or long emails. | Founders, M&A advisors, venture funds, family offices and enterprise security teams running fundraising, M&A or due diligence |
Plans side by side
Loom
Starter$0
Business$18per user / month
Business + AI$24per user / month
EnterpriseCustom
Papermark
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loom
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Papermark
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loom vs Papermark”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loom-vs-papermark, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.