LoomWe're bringing video messaging to work and empowering everyone to communicate more effectively, wherever they are.
vs
PandaDocProposals & Contracts
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Loom vs PandaDoc
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
PandaDoc is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 1.1 for Loom, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loom if…
- You need CCPA or SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
Choose PandaDoc if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 1.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (signs Business Associate Agreement) or eIDAS or ESIGN and UETA or FERPA or 21 CFR Part 11 for eSignatures coverage
- All-in-one document workflows covering proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures
- Widely considered a market leader and top-rated for proposals and contracts
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Loom | PandaDoc |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.1% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #32 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 62% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loom 0pp · PandaDoc 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
PandaDoc leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoomPandaDoc
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Loom ranked higher
0PandaDoc ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loom | PandaDoc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Is there a free sales enablement platform for small teams? | ChatGPT | #5 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loom | PandaDoc |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $18 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, built on AWS infrastructure | Cloud-based service with US or EU data residency options and AES-256 encryption at rest |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 Type 2 | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (signs Business Associate Agreement), GDPR, eIDAS, ESIGN and UETA, FERPA, 21 CFR Part 11 for eSignatures |
| Support | Priority support on Business and Business + AI plans, Dedicated support and a dedicated account manager on Enterprise | — |
| Founded | 2016 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series C · $204M raised | Round led by Índico Capital Partners (stage reported differently by sources) |
| Best for | Sales, engineering, customer support and design teams that want to share context by video message instead of meetings or long emails. | Sales, revenue and operations teams producing proposals, quotes and contracts |
Plans side by side
Loom
Starter$0
Business$18per user / month
Business + AI$24per user / month
EnterpriseCustom
PandaDoc
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loom
- Async video for sharing updates and feedback
PandaDoc
- All-in-one document workflows covering proposals, quotes, contracts, and e-signatures
- Widely considered a market leader and top-rated for proposals and contracts
- Intuitive drag-and-drop proposal creation with template libraries
- Free plan for basic e-signatures and proposals
- Annual billing lowers the cost of paid tiers
- Costs rise as teams scale up
- Free plan has usage limits
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loom vs PandaDoc”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loom-vs-pandadoc, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.