Loxo vs SmartRecruiters
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
SmartRecruiters is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 13.6 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loxo if…
- 7-day free trial
Choose SmartRecruiters if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.6 vs 1.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (31% vs 17% positive)
- You need TISAX or CCPA or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or UK Cyber Essentials coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 13.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #13 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 3.7% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 21 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 31% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · SmartRecruiters 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
SmartRecruiters leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top recruiting platform vendors | Perplexity | #15 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | — |
| Deployment | — | SaaS |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | — | TISAX, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, UK Cyber Essentials |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | Community & Help Center, Developer Documentation |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Series E · $205M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Corporate employers with at least 50 employees and a significant number of open job requisitions |
Plans side by side
Loxo
SmartRecruiters
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
SmartRecruiters
- Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
- Suited to high-growth global enterprises
- Modern, collaborative interface
- Broad, consolidated talent-acquisition suite
- Enterprise hiring and collaborative applicant tracking platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs SmartRecruiters”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-smartrecruiters, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.