Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
SmartRecruitersAI-Powered Hiring Platform That Delivers Results
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs SmartRecruiters

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 13.6 for SmartRecruiters, and ranks ahead in 74% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 13.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 31% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or GDPR or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards

Choose SmartRecruiters if…

  • You need TISAX or CCPA or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or UK Cyber Essentials coverage
  • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
  • Suited to high-growth global enterprises
  • Modern, collaborative interface

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse SmartRecruiters
Visibility score38.5%13.6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#13
Share of voice8.1%3.7%
Mentions this run4321
Positive in AI answers56%31%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · SmartRecruiters 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
15%
AI Mode
33.5%
4.8%
Perplexity
38.3%
21.1%
GreenhouseSmartRecruiters

Head to head in AI answers

19 engine answers name both brands

14Greenhouse ranked higher
5SmartRecruiters ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseSmartRecruiters
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
Deployment—SaaS
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSTISAX, CCPA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, UK Cyber Essentials
Support—Community & Help Center, Developer Documentation
Founded20122010
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesSan Francisco, California
Employees501–1,000501–1,000
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries E · $205M raised
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesCorporate employers with at least 50 employees and a significant number of open job requisitions

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

SmartRecruiters

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    SmartRecruiters

    • Balances consumer-grade candidate experience with enterprise ATS features
    • Suited to high-growth global enterprises
    • Modern, collaborative interface
    • Broad, consolidated talent-acquisition suite
    • Enterprise hiring and collaborative applicant tracking platform

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs SmartRecruiters”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-smartrecruiters, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.