LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
Spark HireHiring software for lean teams
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs Spark Hire
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Spark Hire is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 2.6 versus 1.9 for Loxo, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want a lower entry price ($149 vs $335)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- 7-day free trial
Choose Spark Hire if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.6 vs 1.9)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or EEO compliance coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 2.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · Spark Hire 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Spark Hire leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoSpark Hire
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Loxo ranked higher
0Spark Hire ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Loxo | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which recruiting tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #11 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | Spark Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | $335 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | No |
| Integrations | 100+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, EEO compliance |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | 24x6 support at no charge, Live training and onboarding, Dedicated customer success team |
| Founded | 2012 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Highland Park, Illinois, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Venture round with Stage 2 Capital as an investor |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Small and medium organizations of about 50 to 500 employees with lean HR or talent acquisition teams |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
Spark Hire
Recruit Pro$335month, billed annually
Recruit Growth$499month, billed annually
Recruit EnterpriseCustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
Spark Hire
- Recommended as best overall for lean or early-stage startups
- ATS plans require annual contracts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs Spark Hire”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-spark-hire, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.