LoxoThe AI recruiting platform for scaling firms
vs
TestGorillaFind great talent. Prove they can do the job.
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
Loxo vs TestGorilla
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loxo is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.6 for TestGorilla.
Choose Loxo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.6)
- 7-day free trial
Choose TestGorilla if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR compliant or SOC 2 Type II compliant coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Loxo | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #40 | #59 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Loxo 0pp · TestGorilla 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loxo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LoxoTestGorilla
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Loxo ranked higher
0TestGorilla ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Loxo | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $149 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $74 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 7-day trial | Yes |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | — | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type II compliant |
| Support | Dedicated success team and priority support on Enterprise plans, Free migration for Core teams of 3+ seats, with guided self-serve tooling below that | Help center, 24/7 live chat, Email support, Digital onboarding guides |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Growth investment led by Tritium Partners · $115M raised | Series A · $80M raised |
| Best for | Scaling recruiting firms, including executive search, recruiting, staffing and RPO firms, and in-house talent teams | Small companies with limited hiring needs (Core plan) and larger teams screening candidates at scale (Plus plan). |
Plans side by side
Loxo
Core$149per user / month, billed annually
ProfessionalCustombilled annually, contact sales for pricing
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual agreement
TestGorilla
Gorilla Sourcing Free$0month
Gorilla Sourcing Core$74per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Sourcing Plus$134per Sourcing seat per month, billed annually
Gorilla Assessments Free$0month
Gorilla Assessments Core$215per account per month, billed annually (from)
Gorilla Assessments Plus$520per account per month, billed annually (from)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Loxo
- 7-day free trial
- High per-user pricing
- Annual-only plans paid upfront
TestGorilla
- automated sending of tests and automatic score return
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Loxo vs TestGorilla”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/loxo-vs-testgorilla, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.