Make vs Microsoft Power Apps
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Microsoft Power Apps is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 55.6 versus 6.3 for Make, and ranks ahead in 90% of the answers that name both.
Choose Make if…
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
Choose Microsoft Power Apps if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.6 vs 6.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (44% vs 41% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Make | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.3% | 55.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−7.8% | up+0.2% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #16 | #1 |
| Share of voice | 2.3% | 9.8% |
| Mentions this run | 13 | 55 |
| Positive in AI answers | 41% | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Make −7.8pp · Microsoft Power Apps +0.30000000000000426pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Microsoft Power Apps leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
10 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Make | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|---|
| What features matter most in a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #1 | #2 |
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | ChatGPT | #7 | #2 |
| How do companies build internal apps without a full engineering team without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #7 | #4 |
| What should a low-code platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #7 | #4 |
| What should a low-code platform integrate with? | AI Mode | #4 | #2 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #7 | #4 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #13 | #3 |
| Compare the leading Low-Code & No-Code platforms | Perplexity | #16 | #1 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | AI Mode | #6 | #1 |
| Best low-code platform with AI features | Perplexity | #10 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Make | Microsoft Power Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud, hosted on Amazon AWS | Microsoft Cloud, as part of Power Platform |
| Integrations | 3500+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Help center, Community forum, 24/7 support on Enterprise plans, Dedicated support team on Enterprise plans | Documentation, Power Apps Learn, Power Apps Support, Power Apps Community |
| Founded | 2012 | — |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Redmond, Washington |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Best for | Teams and organizations deploying AI and automation across the business, from a single department to company-wide. | Organizations whose business users and professional developers need to build and govern internal business apps together |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Make
- Free tier with 1,000 credits per month
- Transparent pricing with paid plans from $12/month
- Visual, no-code automation between existing apps
- Integrations with more than 3,000 apps
- Built-in AI agents for business workflows
Microsoft Power Apps
- Most widely used low-code platform by adoption
- Strong integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, Azure and Dataverse
- Strong default for Microsoft-centric enterprises and citizen developers
- Transparent, publicly listed pricing
- Free developer plan and trial for testing
- Pricing for premium connectors and services can be unclear
- Can be overkill for simple apps versus cheaper tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Make vs Microsoft Power Apps”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/make-vs-microsoft-power-apps, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.