MastraTypeScript AI Framework for Agents and Apps
vs
OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Mastra vs OneReach.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mastra is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 1 for OneReach.ai.
Choose Mastra if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 1)
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mastra | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #56 | #58 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mastra 0pp · OneReach.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mastra leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MastraOneReach.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Mastra ranked higher
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mastra | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $250 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted on any Node.js-compatible environment, or hosted on Mastra Cloud and Mastra Platform. | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST |
| Support | Shared Slack support channel (Enterprise), Dedicated support engineer (Enterprise), SLA support 8-5 Monday-Friday, 8am-6pm PST | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models |
| Founded | 2024 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | Denver, CO |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series A · $35M raised | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) |
| Best for | Developers and teams building AI agents in TypeScript and JavaScript | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. |
Plans side by side
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mastra
- Type-safe, production-grade application code
- Suited to serious production systems
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mastra vs OneReach.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mastra-vs-onereach-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.