MediusAutonomous AP, powered by agentic AI
vs
PayhawkAI-native spend management platform for global teams
Comparison · Expense Management · weekly run Nov 2
Medius vs Payhawk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Payhawk is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 1.7 versus 0 for Medius.
Choose Medius if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 9001 or SOC 3 coverage
Choose Payhawk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.7 vs 0)
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO 27001 or GDPR compliant or DORA compliant or CSA STAR Level 1 or IDW PS 880 coverage
- recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
- recommended for global finance teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Medius | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Expense Management | #33 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 60% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Medius 0pp · Payhawk 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Payhawk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MediusPayhawk
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Medius ranked higher
0Payhawk ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Medius | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | Included |
| Deployment | 100% cloud-based | Web portal and mobile app |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022, ISO 9001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 | PCI DSS Level 1, ISO 27001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, DORA compliant, CSA STAR Level 1, IDW PS 880 |
| Support | Standard Support (AP Essentials plan), Customer success team, Educational webinars and excellence program | Help center, Sales team, Dedicated implementations team at no additional cost |
| Founded | 2001 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Linköping, Sweden | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Minority stake (private equity, Advent International) | Series B extension |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise finance teams, especially product-based industries with high invoice volumes | Scaleups and enterprise companies that manage spend across several entities and countries. |
Plans side by side
Payhawk
Travel$299month (starting at)
Cards & Expenses$449month (starting at)
Accounts Payable$349month (starting at)
Procurement$499month (starting at)
Payhawk CompleteCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Medius
Profile in progress.
Payhawk
- recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
- recommended for global finance teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Medius vs Payhawk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/medius-vs-payhawk, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.