Expensify vs Payhawk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Expensify is the stronger AI pick in Expense Management: it has a visibility score of 46.5 versus 1.7 for Payhawk, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Expensify if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (46.5 vs 1.7)
- You need more native integrations (45+ vs 40+)
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Easy receipt capture and reimbursements
Choose Payhawk if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 42% positive)
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO 27001 or SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR compliant or DORA compliant or CSA STAR Level 1 or IDW PS 880 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Expensify | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 46.5% | 1.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Expense Management | #2 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 10.9% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 55 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 60% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Expensify 0pp · Payhawk 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Expensify leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Expensify | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Expense Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #4 | #10 |
| Best expense management tool for startups | Perplexity | #4 | #8 |
| Compare the leading Expense Management platforms | Perplexity | #3 | #9 |
| Official website of the top expense management tool vendors | ChatGPT | #4 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Expensify | Payhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Onboarding fee | — | Included |
| Deployment | — | Web portal and mobile app |
| Integrations | 45+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS | PCI DSS Level 1, ISO 27001, SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, DORA compliant, CSA STAR Level 1, IDW PS 880 |
| Support | ExpensifyHelp help center, Community forum | Help center, Sales team, Dedicated implementations team at no additional cost |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | London, United Kingdom |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | IPO (Nasdaq: EXFY) | Series B extension |
| Best for | Individuals organizing their own expenses, and businesses managing expenses for teams of any size | Scaleups and enterprise companies that manage spend across several entities and countries. |
Plans side by side
Expensify
Pricing not available.
Payhawk
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Expensify
- Easy receipt capture and reimbursements
- Transparent, predictable per-user pricing
- Free tier for basic receipt scanning and tracking
- Automated SmartScan receipt reading and reporting
- Simple to use for small businesses
- Advanced multi-user approval workflows and syncing require paid plan
- Savings depend on plan structure and use of Expensify Card
- Less suitable when teams want card-led spend controls
Payhawk
- recommended for international per diem and policy complexity
- recommended for global finance teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Expensify vs Payhawk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/expensify-vs-payhawk, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.