Mendix vs n8n
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mendix is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 33.1 versus 1.3 for n8n, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Mendix if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (33.1 vs 1.3)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or ISO 22301 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO 9001 or PCI DSS Level 1 service provider or NEN 7510 or FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
Choose n8n if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 42% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or GDPR coverage
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Mendix | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 33.1% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.6% | down−1.6% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #3 | #40 |
| Share of voice | 7.8% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 45 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Mendix +1.6000000000000014pp · n8n −1.5999999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mendix leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Mendix | n8n |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #13 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Mendix | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1,090 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Public cloud, private cloud or air-gapped environments | Hosted on n8n Cloud or self-hosted on-prem or with Docker. |
| Integrations | — | 2000+ |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO 9001, PCI DSS Level 1 service provider, NEN 7510, FedRAMP (Mendix Cloud for US Government) | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | Free Online Academy with learning paths and certifications, Standard support plan, 9 AM to 5 PM, Premium support plan, 24/7, Expert Services for onboarding and scaling | Forum support on all plans, Email support on Enterprise, Dedicated support with SLA on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2005 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Funding round (no lead investor or valuation given) · $38M raised | Series C · $240M raised |
| Best for | Enterprises building department-wide business applications and mission-critical core systems | Technical teams that want the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. |
Plans side by side
Mendix
n8n
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Mendix
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex applications
- Strong model-driven, high-productivity development
- Cloud-native, multi-experience development
- Bridges citizen developers and professional developers
- Strong for enterprise and industrial application development
- Costs less predictable due to infrastructure and add-ons
- Free plan limited to one app with production and scaling limits
- Enterprise tiers can be expensive, starting around $1,090 per month
n8n
- Avoids vendor lock-in and offers self-hosting
- Excellent low-code visual workflow automation
- Strong native AI agent and MCP support
- Broad integrations across SaaS apps and APIs
- Free self-hosted edition and affordable cloud plans
- Self-hosting requires technical skill such as Docker or server management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mendix vs n8n”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mendix-vs-n8n, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.