NetdataReal-time observability with per-second metrics, logs and traces, and AI troubleshooting.
vs
UptraceCut your observability bill by 90%
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
Netdata vs Uptrace
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Netdata is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 1.2 versus 0.7 for Uptrace.
Choose Netdata if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.2 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Uptrace if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Netdata | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.2% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #28 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Netdata 0pp · Uptrace 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Netdata leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
NetdataUptrace
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Netdata ranked higher
0Uptrace ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Netdata | Uptrace |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Open-source agents run on your own nodes; Netdata Cloud is offered as SaaS or on-premises. | Uptrace Cloud, or self-hosted with Docker, Ansible or Kubernetes, or on-premises with a license |
| Integrations | 800+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2 | — |
| Support | Community help via Discord, forums and GitHub Discussions, Premium support available, Dedicated support team on on-premises plans, Nedi AI support assistant | 16/5 enterprise support across EU and US business hours, Email and scheduled calls, Dedicated support engineer on on-premises plans |
| Founded | 2016 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Chisinau, Moldova |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series A extension · $33M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Platform engineers, DevOps and SRE teams running Linux, Kubernetes and hybrid infrastructure who want per-second monitoring with zero configuration. | Engineering teams that run OpenTelemetry and want traces, metrics and logs in one platform at predictable cost. |
Plans side by side
Netdata
Community$0free forever, up to 5 nodes
Business$7node/month
Homelab$90year
Cloud On-PremisesCustomcontact sales
Uptrace
Uptrace CloudCustomper GB ingested, usage-based; no seats or hosts
Community Edition$0free forever, self-hosted
On-premisesCustomlicense, contact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Netdata
- real-time, high-granularity infrastructure monitoring
- strong server monitoring
Uptrace
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Netdata vs Uptrace”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/netdata-vs-uptrace, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.