Skip to content
SlateIndex
OmadaA Leader In Identity Governance and Administration
vs
Transmit SecurityCustomer identity and access management with fraud prevention in one platform
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Omada vs Transmit Security

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Transmit Security is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Omada if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 3 coverage
  • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
  • Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass

Choose Transmit Security if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0.6)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
  • Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
  • Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Omada Transmit Security
Visibility score0.6%0.7%
Change vs last weekup+0.6%up+0.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#34#33
Share of voice0.3%0.4%
Mentions this run11
Positive in AI answers0%50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Omada 1%

Omada 0pp · Transmit Security 0pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Transmit Security leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.3%
2%
AI Mode
0%
1.3%
Perplexity
1.1%
0%
OmadaTransmit Security

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Omada ranked higher
1Transmit Security ranked higher
PromptEngineOmadaTransmit Security
Which Identity & Access Management vendors do analysts recommend? ChatGPT#9#5

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOmadaTransmit Security
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—$50,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentSaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premisesSaaS
ComplianceISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3—
SupportCustomer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional servicesEnterprise SLA with premium support
Founded20002014
HeadquartersCopenhagen, DenmarkTel Aviv, Israel
Employees201–500201–500
FundingMajority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital)Series A · $543M raised
Best forRegulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administrationLarge enterprises such as banks and insurers needing combined customer identity and fraud prevention

Plans side by side

Omada

Pricing not available.

Transmit Security

Full Mosaic Platform$200,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity$100,000year for 100K Monthly Active Users (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Fraud and Threat Detection and Response$100,000year for 10M Logins (starting at)
Mosaic for Identity Verification$50,000year for 100K ID Checks (starting at)
Transmit Security pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Omada

  • Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
  • Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass

    Transmit Security

    • Innovative player focused on passwordless authentication
    • Risk-based fraud prevention capabilities
    • Modern platform for customer-facing identity experiences
    • Noted by Gartner for specialized fraud prevention and CIAM architectures

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Omada vs Transmit Security”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/omada-vs-transmit-security, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.