OrangeHRMAll in One HR Software for Businesses
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
OrangeHRM vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0 for OrangeHRM.
Choose OrangeHRM if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OrangeHRM | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #78 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OrangeHRM 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OrangeHRMWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0OrangeHRM ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OrangeHRM | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) and on-premises | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | White glove implementation, Ongoing support wherever you are located, Support and maintenance plans | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 2005 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Secaucus, NJ, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Secondary · $0M raised | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Small businesses and start-ups on the free Starter edition, and larger organisations that want a modular HR suite on the Advanced edition | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
OrangeHRM
Starter$0free (open-source)
AdvancedCustomper employee per month (custom quote)
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OrangeHRM
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OrangeHRM vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/orangehrm-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.