OutSystems vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 4)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 13% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.2% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.5% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #2 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 8.2% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 47 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #3 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #2 | #9 |
| Which low-code platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #3 | #4 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #2 | #12 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | AI Mode | #3 | #7 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #2 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | — |
| Integrations | 400+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | — | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2001 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Funding round |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.