Skip to content
SlateIndex
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

OutSystems vs Zapier

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 9.9 for Zapier, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.

Choose OutSystems if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 9.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 29% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage

Choose Zapier if…

  • You need more native integrations (9000+ vs 400+)
  • You need SOC 3 or CCPA coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric OutSystems Zapier
Visibility score40.2%9.9%
Change vs last weekdown−2.5%down−0.1%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#2#11
Share of voice8.2%2.7%
Mentions this run4715
Positive in AI answers42%29%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3OutSystems 40%

OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp · Zapier 0pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
51.5%
8.2%
AI Mode
32.8%
15.6%
Perplexity
36.3%
5.9%
OutSystemsZapier

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

4OutSystems ranked higher
2Zapier ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOutSystemsZapier
Pricing modelFlat tiersUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $19.99 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plansMulti-tenant cloud
Integrations400+9000+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE)SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA
Support—Email support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on
Founded20012011
HeadquartersBoston, Massachusetts, United StatesSan Francisco, CA
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingSeries F, led by KKREquity crowdfunding
Best forRegulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trustBusinesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps.

Plans side by side

OutSystems

OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
OutSystems pricing

Zapier

Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Zapier pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

OutSystems

  • Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
  • High performance and speed in app delivery
  • Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
  • Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
  • Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
  • Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
  • High cost for enterprise tiers

Zapier

  • Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
  • Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
  • Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
  • Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
  • Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
  • Free plans have limited monthly activities
  • Not a standalone marketing automation platform

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-zapier, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.