PCRecruiterRecruitment CRM and ATS for growing agencies
vs
WorkableAll-in-one HR software
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3
PCRecruiter vs Workable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Workable is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 30.1 versus 0 for PCRecruiter.
Choose PCRecruiter if…
- You want a lower entry price ($125 vs $299)
- You need SOC 2 Examined coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Workable if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (30.1 vs 0)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- fast deployment and ease of use
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | PCRecruiter | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 30.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Recruiting | #79 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 44% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
PCRecruiter 0pp · Workable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Workable leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PCRecruiterWorkable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0PCRecruiter ranked higher
0Workable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | PCRecruiter | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $125 per seat / mo | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 15-day trial |
| Deployment | Private, single tenant database hosted by the vendor on infrastructure it owns; self-hosting is also available. | Cloud-based SaaS |
| Integrations | — | 270+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Examined | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 |
| Support | US-based phone support, answered in under 30 seconds on average, Support ticket to the same US-based team, First training session within one business day of onboarding call | Priority support on Premier and Enterprise plans |
| Founded | 1998 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
| Employees | — | 201–500 |
| Funding | — | Series C, led by Zouk Capital · $84M raised |
| Best for | Boutique and growing permanent placement agencies, typically with 1 to 25 recruiters. | Companies of any size that care about time-to-value and ease of use and want a system that is fast to implement and easy to adopt, with a focus on small and medium-sized businesses. |
Plans side by side
Workable
Standard$299month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Premier$599month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Enterprise$719month, billed annually, bundle of Recruiting and HR
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
PCRecruiter
Profile in progress.
Workable
- fast deployment and ease of use
- intuitive automation and candidate tracking
- transparent pricing and free trial
- all-in-one ATS and hiring platform
- candidate sourcing
- costs more than lightweight ATS options
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “PCRecruiter vs Workable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pcrecruiter-vs-workable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.