PegaThe leading AI-powered platform for enterprise transformation
vs
RasaBuild agents your company brags about
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Pega vs Rasa
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rasa is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 0.6 for Pega.
Choose Pega if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or PCI DSS or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or HITRUST or GDPR or FedRAMP or HIPAA or IRAP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
Choose Rasa if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 0.6)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pega | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.6% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #68 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pega 0pp · Rasa 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rasa leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
PegaRasa
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Pega ranked higher
0Rasa ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pega | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP | — |
| Support | — | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews |
| Founded | 1983 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | IPO | Series C · $70M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase |
Plans side by side
Pega
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
Rasa
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pega vs Rasa”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pega-vs-rasa, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.