Pega vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UiPath is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 2.4 versus 2 for Pega, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Pega if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or PCI DSS or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or FedRAMP or IRAP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
Choose UiPath if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.4 vs 2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 20% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or C5 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Pega | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.9% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #34 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Pega −0.6000000000000001pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UiPath leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Pega | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #10 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #7 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Pega | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 1983 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
Pega
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pega vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/pega-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.