QuoterQuoting, Contracts & Payments
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Quoter vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0 for Quoter.
Choose Quoter if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 3 report coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $299)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Quoter | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #51 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Quoter 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QuoterQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Quoter ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Quoter | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Onboarding fee | $495 | — |
| Deployment | — | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 3 report | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Help Center, Live support on every paid plan, Customer Success onboarding for Quoter activation | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | — | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 201–500 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed VC, Cohesive Capital Partners named as investor | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | MSPs that need quoting, contracts and payments in one workflow | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Quoter
Profile in progress.
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Quoter vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/quoter-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.