Skip to content
SlateIndex
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
vs
SalesforceThe #1 AI CRM
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Qwilr vs Salesforce

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Salesforce is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 29.9 versus 28.3 for Qwilr, and ranks ahead in 35% of the answers that name both.

Choose Qwilr if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 21% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation

Choose Salesforce if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (29.9 vs 28.3)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or HITRUST coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
  • Powerful reporting, automation and customisation

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Qwilr Salesforce
Visibility score28.3%29.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#4#3
Share of voice7.2%7.3%
Mentions this run3737
Positive in AI answers51%21%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Qwilr 28%

Qwilr 0pp · Salesforce 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Salesforce leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
30.2%
28.9%
AI Mode
26.9%
39.4%
Perplexity
27.8%
21.5%
QwilrSalesforce

Head to head in AI answers

17 engine answers name both brands

11Qwilr ranked higher
6Salesforce ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionQwilrSalesforce
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry price$35 per seat / mo—
Free planNo · 14-day trial—
DeploymentWeb-based, web-native softwareCloud (SaaS)
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSSISO 27001:2022, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, HITRUST
SupportEmail support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessionsPhone, Trailblazer Community, Success Plans, Trailhead training
Founded20141999
HeadquartersRedfern, New South Wales, AustraliaSan Francisco, California
Employees51–2005,000+
FundingSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised—
Best forSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.Businesses from small companies to large enterprises wanting sales, service, marketing and commerce on one CRM platform

Plans side by side

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Salesforce

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Qwilr

  • Interactive, web-based proposals
  • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
  • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
  • Lower cost with annual billing
  • 14-day free trial available

    Salesforce

    • Powerful reporting, automation and customisation
    • Market leader and gold standard CRM
    • Deep ecosystem and strong CRM integrations
    • Built for large enterprises and scaling
    • Free trial to test its features
    • Requires a dedicated administrator to manage
    • High enterprise pricing
    • Heavy, slow implementation that suits large budgets

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qwilr vs Salesforce”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qwilr-vs-salesforce, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.